Bollywood and Hollywood: Closing the Gap ?

June 29, 2007

blank3.gif

I shamelessly recycle the comments I posted on a very interesting article about the Indian movie market. The evolutions of the Bollywood cinema in the last years reveal both local and global issues.

Bollywood cinema: A force to reckon with

When I arrived in Singapore 3 years ago, I discovered that Indian pop culture was very strong and that my NUS Indian classmates were more interested in Indian songs and movies than they were in the global offerings in terms of pop music (Britney, Justin and Christina) and Hollywood.

Indeed, my Indian MBA classmates were surprised to learn that I had already seen “Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham” (2001), an almost 3 hours long movie starring Amitab Bacchan, (the reigning King of Bollywood), the ridiculously handsome Hrithik Roshan, Shahrukh Khan and Kareena Kapoor.

kabhi_khushi_kabhie_gham_270.jpg 
The cast of  ”Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham”
Almost 3 hours of glamour, drama
… and singing
 

Supply being more ample in Singapore than it was in France, I had more opportunities to see Indian movies and get interested in the Bollywood culture.

I was a bit dissapointed by “Bride and Prejudice”. I saw Gurinder Chada’s movie as a flawed attempt to “close the gap” between Bollywood and Hollywood, bringing the best of Bollywood (and what a best it was, in the person of Aishwarya Raj!) in a format following the Hollywood conventions of romantic comedy on the canvas of Jane Austen’s master piece.

bride-and-prejudice.jpg
Martin Henderson and Aishwarya Raj in “Bride and Prejudice”
To respect the Bollywood conventions,
they did not share an onscreen kiss

Somehow, the plot and the characters could not choose a stand between both cultures: the Western characters had the romantic behavior of well groomed Indians, which was weird. The musical parts, except a lively opening dance, were too stretched (Gospel on a Californian beach ? Aishwarya getting all rock an roll?)

When enjoying “Dhoom 2″, I felt that Bollywood was on the move to “close the gap” with Hollywood. The mix between spectacular action sequences and stunts on par with their US counterparts (including the suspension of disbelief), and catchy songs and over the top dance numbers in the best Indian tradition was perfect. And the setting of the second part was Rio de Janeiro, with Baghra music melting seemlessly with capoeira in eye-popping sequences.

While the prequel, “Dhoom 1″ was just a Bollywood rip off of Taxi, banking on the Indian biker culture, “Dhoom 2″ brought the game to the next level. The film was like Mission Impossible (narcissistic lead man, chase sequences and gun fights), with a healthy dose of Bollywood fare: catchy songs and dance numbers.

The added “bonus” was the two stars sharing an onscreen kiss in a very dramatic sequence, an addition that indicates that the producers acknowledge the acceptance of Hollywood codes by the Indian public (although a few frustrated souls threatened to sue Aishwarya Raj for “degrading Indian women”).

dhoom2.jpg
Hrithik Roshan and Aishwarya Raj in DHOOM 2
The Bollywood stars “closed the gap”
and broke all conventions by sharing
 a controversial onscreen kiss
  

“Tararumpum” sounded like and Indian style version of “Days of Thunder” or worse, “Talladega Nights” made more realistic with a US setting, so I wrote it down as another Indian attempt at closing the gap. I took a rain check on this one, thinking that Bollywood “going 100%” was a bit too much for a good Bollywood experience. Box Office reception was lukewarm yet acceptable, factoring in the simultaneous opening of Spiderman 3 in India.

The release of the last opuses of the Spiderman franchise in India might be the signal that Hollywood (or the local subsidiaries of US distributors) had decided to close the gap with the Indian public, by offering its movies in Indian languages.

Spiderman 3 did three things right. First, it released a record number of prints – 588 compared with an average of 500 for Hindi films. There were also 261 prints in Hindi, 162 in English, 78 in Tamil, 81 in Telugu and 6 in Bhojpuri (a language spoken in eastern state Bihar) – a record number of prints for any foreign movie. Spiderman 2 was released in 2004 with 303 prints with about 100 prints in local languages and was the third best grosser in India.
(Source: The Asian Pacific Post, June 1st, 2007)


Obviously, for Hollywood, “closing the gap” is not made in terms of adopting or adapting cultural codes, but more in terms of adapting the products for easier local consumption. The ample ressources of the Indian movie industry in terms of dubbing, post synchronization, etc. make it easy and economically sound for American studios to adapt their movies to the tastes of the public, one thing that the French movie industry has failed to do so far.

I just keep wondering what will happen in the near future. Will the Indian public, which is young and getting more educated every year, switch to “the real thing”, i.e. watching American movies in English language?

Pop music and movies closing the gap too ?

Globalization is at work in India too. A Thai pop music star, Tata Young, made a successful cover of “Dhoom 1″ title song. It failed to make it big in the West, but was a succes in South East Asia.

 Tata Young performing the theme song of “Dhoom 1″

What will be next? Will Indian movie stars globally release singles of their movie songs in English as part of the promotion plan of Bollywood movies ? Will Smith did the same successfully for “Men In Black” and “Wild Wild West”.


Will Smith’s video clip – “Men in Black”

Will Smith’s experience could also give a few hints to Hollywood. Pop music is an increasing part of the global promotion plan of movies. Example abound like Destiny’s Child “Survivor” hit, paired with “Charlie’s Angels”, but what abour songs as-part-of-the movie ? The delightful “Ella Enchanted” (2004) had a partly Indian cast, and some nice singing numbers.


“Ella enchanted”’s final sequence

 With Hollywood actors increasingly better at singing than before (Anne Hattaway is a trained singer and Justin Timberlake starts an acting carreer), pop music could bring the entertainment value of movies to the next level.

John Travolta’s Chilly Palmer was involved in movie making in “Get Shorty”, later moving on to pop music in the sequel, “Be Cool”. Does anyone see a pattern here ?

Copyright: Alfred LARGANGE – June 2007


Penguins teach us about Cool

June 28, 2007

blank2.gif

I first wanted to write a piece about the “Penguin Fad” when I saw the promotional posters for “Surf is Up”. This was the fourth movie prominently figuring Penguins to hit the Singaporean screens in a 24 month period.

What I was treated to was a handful of insights about Cool.

The last wave of the Penguin fad

“Surf is up” is the last wave of the Penguin fad. First was the dramatic French documentary, “March of the Penguins” (January 2005 in France), revealing the hardships and the beauty Life in Antarctica. Then there were the master escapists in “Madagascar” (May 2005), with their smooth commando moves and their slightly neurotic leader. After that were the delightful “Happy Feet” (November 2006) and its moving message against over fishing in the Southern seas.

penguin-movies.jpg
The last movie of the Penguin Fad
happens to be the ”Coolest”…
despite its tropical setting

With “Surf is up”, it seems that the Hollywood dream factories are poised to milk the Penguin fad to the last drop. The result is a 3D CGI light and funny lesson in the Art of Being cool, in the form of a “mockumentary”.

A lesson in Cool

Cody Maverick, a young Rockhopper Penguin lives in “small town Antarctica” * and spends all his spare time surfing the waves caused by the big chunks of glaciers falling in the ocean. After meeting with Big Z, a legendary surf champion on his world tour, Cody has become and avid surfer, pursuing his calling up to the point of taking part in a World Surf Contest set in a paradisiac tropical island.

Along the road, Cody pulls an aged and depressed Big Z from retirement, befriends Joe, a surfing rooster from Michigan and competes with bullying champion Tank. By the way, Cody does not win the championship, as the Hollywood standards would have it. All he takes from the adventure is to understand on a deep level the advice Big Z, his father figure, gave him all those years ago: “Find your way”.

What we can can get from this entertaining movie are insight about the essence of Cool.

Cool is about being oneself

Cool is not showing off one’s abilities and championship trophies like Tank (Doing push ups over a bed of hot coals bed? Come on!). The winner of the contest, surprisingly, is Joe, the coolest rooster ever to grace movie screens**, a living embodiment of Carlos SANTANA’s words: “Choose integrity over popularity and you will always be Cool”.

How does this strain of coolness translate for brands ? Will all the coolhunters and branding consultants finally say that the best way to reach the Graal is just to being oneself? It may be so.

Today’s Cool automotive brands are the ones who refused decades ago to compromise their identities and features by adopt the most economically efficient designs (Front wheel drive and transverse engines).
MERCEDES-BENZ, BMW, ASTON MARTIN and PORSCHE have retained their Rear Wheel Drive layouts (PORSCHE has even built cars on the same architecture for the last 43 years!). Staying true to oneself does not mean shunning improvement: All these carmakers have invested in technology and engineering to keep their product up to date in term or road capabilities, comfort and safety.

 Coolness is a challenge in the luxury universe 

What is Luxury if not the relentless pursuit of perfection once a Brand identity has been set? LOUIS-VUITTON never gave up its monogram leather, although more cost effective materials have emerged for luggage manufacture.

cool-products.jpg
PORSCHE 911 and VUITTON Bag.
These iconic luxury products have reach Cool because
their Brand integrity has paid in the long run. 

Coolness is the Luxury universe might send a paradoxical message: “Look how unaffected I appear to be while all I care about is to appear unaffected”.
Coolness is not about “catching the next wave” in Consumer Culture. This is just called “trying to look Smart”. Coolness as a status cannot be achieved overnight with obscenely huge Media budgets and frantic PR. Chasing consumer and popular culture trends like coolhunters do not automatically lead to Cool.

Telling Brands Managers in the search of Cool to just “Let [their] Brands be themselves” might sound as a disappointing advice. However, by winning the Surf Contest by enjoying himself on his board, without even seeming to care about the competition, Joe the Surfing Rooster gives a great lesson: the roots of success are already embedded in the reality of the Brand and its product. What ultimately breeds success is the unflinching dedication of Brand Managers to achieve a higher degree of authenticity, refining the Product’s quality and making it intuitively consistent with the corporate identity and history of the firm producing it.

joevstank.jpg
Chicken Joe vs Tank.
One is really Cool while the other “tries too hard”

“Trying too hard” is not the way. Success happens when a Product that has preserved its integrity meets the untapped need of a sizeable demographic. Let’s not forget that Early Adopters are the forerunners of the Early Majority. Their embracing a new product or service might be the result of clever Marketing Communication campaign, but a genuine recognition of a latent need is the signal of success.

The point is to hone one’s skills and resources, in order to catch the next big wave.

Copyright: Alfred LARGANGE – June 2007


* In reality, Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome) do not live as South as Antarctica, limiting themselves to south Seas archipelagos like the Falklands, the Kerguelen and islands off Argentina and Southern Chile.
** Panchito Pistoles being the closest contender.


For HYUNDAI, the only way is up

June 7, 2007

News continues to trickle about the upcoming HYUNDAI flagship. The Genesis concept car confirms that HYUNDAI has set its mind on challenging established Luxury carmakers like MERCEDES, BMW … and LEXUS.

HYUNDAI Genesis Concept Car
The Korean Concept Car displays
HYUNDAI’s ambitions in Luxury
 

By choosing “Genesis” as the name of its top-of-range model, HYUNDAI follows the step of TOYOTA, whose “Lexus” had the same imposing and assertive (and somewhat generic) ring.

The FR Layout: Spelling luxury and performance

Beneath the classic proportions of the bodywork, the FR layout of the Korean sedan tells the most about the chaebol’s ambitions.

Front engine (“F”) and Rear Wheels Drive (“R”), has been the dominant design of luxury sedans since the dawning ages of the automotive industry. As a matter of fact, the world’s most successful premium car makers, BMW and MERCEDES-BENZ, never let go of the FR layout while other generalists converted to the more efficient FF Layout (Front Engine and Front Wheels Drive cars are lighter, roomier, easier and cheaper to produce).

In might appears as normal that generalist carmakers now scramble back to the FR layout they had abandoned in the 1980s: GENERAL MOTORS aims at reviving its PONTIAC brand by using an Australian sourced FR platform, while PEUGEOT is rumored to get back to FR after phasing out its dull 607 FF sedan and RENAULT is reportedly interested in using FR platforms sourced from NISSAN.

The HYUNDAI Genesis aims at the top of the market

With its FR layout and compulsory V8 engine, the HYUNDAI Genesis is set to enter the North American market as an alternative to other luxury sedans, giving more bang for the buck than its American counterparts from LINCOLN or BUICK. While MERCEDES and BMW can rely on their badge value to stay on top of the market brand-value wise, the LEXUS story may act as a cautionary tale: German luxury brands will face another competitor in the next decade.

What comes as a second surprise is that the HYUNDAI Group is also considering introducing another luxury sedan on the Genesis platform… a car which will be sold under the KIA badge!

Industry observers first though that after taking over the bankrupt KIA Motors in 1998, the HYUNDAI Group would set its second automotive brand to produce bargain models based on common platforms, an example being the quite dull KIA Magentis, sharing the same platform as the head turning HYUNDAI Sonata.


KIA Magentis and HYUNDAI Sonata
Close cousins. Who said the Magentis was
to play Cinderella?
 

What first appears as common sense, on close inspection, does not hold: who wants to build low end or entry-level cars nowadays?*

By pushing both product ranges up, the HYUNDAI Group aims at building enough Brand Equity to sell all its products, whichever their badge, at a premium price. TOYOTA and LEXUS, again, can provide an example: By pushing the Camry sedan to quality levels equivalent to what LEXUS achieved in the 1990s, the fresh global leader is set to command comfortable prices for all its models.

Copyright: Alfred LARGANGE – June 2007


* That is, if the Chinese market is not in your crosshairs…


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.